MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mood and Psychotic Disorders as Prognostic Factors for Sepsis and Septic Shock Mortality: A Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4410274648 on OpenAlexaff
Arjun Gupta, Tushar Tejpal, Cheong Hoon Seo, N. Fabiano, Yuan Qiu, Stanley Sau Ching Wong, JM Lacarrubba Talia, Marco Solmi, Jess G. Fiedorowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSeptic shockMeta-analysisSepsisMoodMood disordersIntensive care medicineMEDLINEPsychiatryInternal medicineAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: There are various mechanisms by which mental disorders and their treatments may influence sepsis-related-mortality including a dysregulated inflammatory response, pro-inflammatory state, and baseline higher risk of infection among patients with mental disorders. With greater than a 2-fold increased risk of death of any cause and 14.2% of deaths worldwide attributable to mental health, mental disorders are increasingly emerging as an important prognostic factor for mortality. Despite investigations into mortality incidence among patients with mental illness, to date, there are no systematic reviews investigating the impact of mental illness on sepsis and septic shock mortality. Therefore, this study intends to estimate the impact of mental disorders on sepsis and septic shock mortality. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for studies investigating the influence of mental disorders on sepsis or septic shock mortality.Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) observational study (prospective or retrospective cohort, case-control), 2) measured deaths among patients with sepsis/septic shock (events, RR, HR, OR), and 3) investigated any clinical mental illness (based on DSM, ICD). Results: Ten full-texts met inclusion criteria with 12 274 586 participants with 13.5% (n = 1 463 389) diagnosed with a mental disorder at baseline. Generalized mental disorders (OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.71-0.81, p < 0.001, k = 3), mood disorders (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.74-0.82, p < 0.001, k = 3), and psychotic disorders (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.42-0.75, p < 0.001, k = 2) associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. Mood disorders (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.72-0.84, p < 0.001, k = 3) and depression in isolation (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.70-0.90, k = 2) were associated with reduced 90-day mortality. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis found evidence associating various mental disorders with reduced mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Specifically, mental disorders may be paradoxically a protective factor due to a pro-inflammatory state and dysregulated immune response, offsetting an otherwise immunocompromised state. Our meta-analysis is limited by retrospective data analysis, underreporting of baseline characteristics, adjustment for important confounders (e.g., psychotropic medication use), and significant statistical heterogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.038
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders→French-language works237,207→