MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410280691 · doi:10.1080/15388220.2025.2502619

Understanding Adolescent Girls’ Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Help-Seeking for Slut-Shaming

2025· article· en· W4410280691 on OpenAlexafffund
René‐Marc Lavigne, Alexa Martin‐Storey, Geneviève Paquette, Stéphanie Boutin, Melanie A. Dirks, Jean‐Pascal Lemelin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of School Violence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPsychologyAdolescent developmentSuicide preventionPoison controlDevelopmental psychologyMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Slut-shaming is a popular concept wherein a person (typically girls or women) experiences social sanctioning for engaging in sexual or sexualized behaviors considered in excess of traditional norms relating to female sexuality. The aim of this study was to explore how adolescent girls perceive and interpret slut-shaming, focusing on support seeking for this type of victimization. A thematic analysis was conducted on semi-structured interviews with 19 adolescent girls aged 12–17. The findings revealed three primary themes: Conceptualizations of slut-shaming, Explanations for slut-shaming, and Barriers and facilitators to help-seeking for slut-shaming. Barriers identified included the ineffectiveness of available supports, the normalization of slut-shaming, and feelings of discomfort or shame. Findings emphasize the need for school-based initiatives targeting slut-shaming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of School ViolenceSame topicSports injuries and preventionFrench-language works237,207