Hydrological Modelling and Multisite Calibration of the Okavango River Basin: Addressing Catchment Heterogeneity and Climate Variability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Okavango River is a transboundary waterway that flows through Angola, Namibia, and Botswana, forming a significant alluvial fan in northwestern Botswana. This fan creates a Delta that plays a vital role in the country’s GDP through tourism. While research has primarily focused on the Delta, the river’s catchment area in the Angolan highlands—its main water source and critical for downstream flow—has been largely overlooked. The basin is under pressure from development, water abstraction, and population growth in the surrounding areas, which negatively affect the environment. These challenges are intensified by climate change, leading to increased water scarcity that necessitates improved management strategies. Currently, there is a lack of published research on the basin’s hydrology, leaving many hydrological parameters related to streamflow in the catchments inadequately understood. Most existing studies have employed single-site calibration methods, which fail to capture the diverse characteristics of the basin’s catchments. To address this, a SWAT model has been developed to simulate the hydrologic behaviour of the basin using sequential multisite calibration with data from five gauging stations, including the main river systems: Cubango and Cuito. The SUFI2 program was used for sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation. The initial sensitivity analysis identified several key parameters: the Soil Evaporation Compensation Factor (ESCO), the SCS curve number under moisture condition II (CN2), Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (SOL_K), and Moist Bulk Density (SOL_BD) as the most influential. The calibration and validation results were generally satisfactory, with a coefficient of determination ranging from 0.47 to 0.72. Analysis of the water balance and parameter sensitivities revealed the varied hydrologic responses of different sub-watersheds with distinct soil profiles. Average annual precipitation varies from 1116 mm upstream to 369 mm downstream, with an evapotranspiration-to-precipitation ratio ranging from 0.47 to 0.95 and a water yield ratio between 0.51 and 0.03, thereby revealing their spatial gradients, notably increasing evapotranspiration and decreasing water yield downstream. The SWAT model’s water balance components provided promising results, with soil moisture data aligned with the TerraClimate dataset, achieving a coefficient of determination of 0.63. Additionally, the model captured the influence of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on local hydrology. However, limitations were noted in simulating peak and low flows due to sparse gauge coverage, data gaps (e.g., groundwater abstraction, point sources), and the use of coarse-resolution climate inputs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".