MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410286328 · doi:10.48048/tis.2025.9587

Endometritis in Cattle: A Review of Current Understanding and Practical Causes of Repeat Breeding

2025· review· en· W4410286328 on OpenAlexaff
Herry Agoes Hermadi, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Erma Safitri, Wiwiek Tyasningsih, Sunaryo Hadi Warsito, Muhammad Khaliim Jati Kusala, Syahputra Wibowo, Ikechukwu Benjamin Moses, Moh. Adiba Kurniawan, Bantari Wisynu Kusuma Wardhani, Saputro Teguh Prasetyo, Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih, Anggreani Desi Ramadhani Rahajeng, Ima Fauziah, Catherine Britta Vidhianty, Arif Nur Muhammad Ansori, Wasito Wasito, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Sciences · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometritisCurrent (fluid)BiologyEngineeringGeneticsPregnancyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most prevalent reproductive illnesses that significantly reduce the livestock industry's profitability is endometritis. Endometritis is an inflammation that occurs in the uterine mucosa (endometrium), which is the inner layer of the uterine wall. Trueperella pyogenes is the most common organism linked to endometritis in cattle. Endometritis is a reproductive condition characterized by signs of repeated breeding. It is evident that there is a correlation between the season of delivery and the occurrence of endometritis, with a higher frequency of endometritis occurring during autumnal deliveries. Although endometritis primarily affects cattle, it can also affect sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and camels. The primary clinical signs of endometritis include an enlarged uterus and an expanded cervical diameter, as well as purulent vaginal discharge. Endometritis is frequently diagnosed using the traditional method based on clinical signs and rectal examination. Cattle can contract endometritis from a variety of sources, including retained fetal membranes, assisted birthing procedures, contamination from dead calves, microbes entering the uterus during delivery, and immunological dysfunction in the genital tract of cows that have recently suffered from dystocia. The standard treatment for endometritis consists of a mix of hormones, such as uterotonics, Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), and antibiotics. Important strategies to lower endometritis include the following management practices: Prevention of postpartum metabolic disorders, early detection and treatment of postpartum uterine diseases, and close monitoring and support during delivery. HIGHLIGHTS This article provides a comprehensive review of endometritis disease in cattle. Endometritis in cattle is an inflammation of the inner lining of the uterus (endometrium), often due to bacterial infection after calving. Endometritis can cause decreased reproductive efficiency and economic losses for the farm. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.350
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in SciencesSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207