MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410286328 · doi:10.48048/tis.2025.9587

Endometritis in Cattle: A Review of Current Understanding and Practical Causes of Repeat Breeding

2025· review· en· W4410286328 on OpenAlex
Herry Agoes Hermadi, Aswin Rafif Khairullah, Erma Safitri, Wiwiek Tyasningsih, Sunaryo Hadi Warsito, Muhammad Khaliim Jati Kusala, Syahputra Wibowo, Ikechukwu Benjamin Moses, Moh. Adiba Kurniawan, Bantari Wisynu Kusuma Wardhani, Saputro Teguh Prasetyo, Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih, Anggreani Desi Ramadhani Rahajeng, Ima Fauziah, Catherine Britta Vidhianty, Arif Nur Muhammad Ansori, Wasito Wasito, Riza Zainuddin Ahmad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Sciences · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometritisCurrent (fluid)BiologyEngineeringGeneticsPregnancyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most prevalent reproductive illnesses that significantly reduce the livestock industry's profitability is endometritis. Endometritis is an inflammation that occurs in the uterine mucosa (endometrium), which is the inner layer of the uterine wall. Trueperella pyogenes is the most common organism linked to endometritis in cattle. Endometritis is a reproductive condition characterized by signs of repeated breeding. It is evident that there is a correlation between the season of delivery and the occurrence of endometritis, with a higher frequency of endometritis occurring during autumnal deliveries. Although endometritis primarily affects cattle, it can also affect sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and camels. The primary clinical signs of endometritis include an enlarged uterus and an expanded cervical diameter, as well as purulent vaginal discharge. Endometritis is frequently diagnosed using the traditional method based on clinical signs and rectal examination. Cattle can contract endometritis from a variety of sources, including retained fetal membranes, assisted birthing procedures, contamination from dead calves, microbes entering the uterus during delivery, and immunological dysfunction in the genital tract of cows that have recently suffered from dystocia. The standard treatment for endometritis consists of a mix of hormones, such as uterotonics, Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), and antibiotics. Important strategies to lower endometritis include the following management practices: Prevention of postpartum metabolic disorders, early detection and treatment of postpartum uterine diseases, and close monitoring and support during delivery. HIGHLIGHTS This article provides a comprehensive review of endometritis disease in cattle. Endometritis in cattle is an inflammation of the inner lining of the uterus (endometrium), often due to bacterial infection after calving. Endometritis can cause decreased reproductive efficiency and economic losses for the farm. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.350
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it