MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410286842 · doi:10.1080/03155986.2025.2502296

Data envelopment analysis on measuring greenhouse gas emissions of liner shipping companies for reducing marine pollution

2025· article· en· W4410286842 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu-Jie Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasData envelopment analysisEnvironmental sciencePollutionEnvironmental economicsBusinessAir pollutionEnvironmental engineeringNatural resource economicsEconomicsMathematicsStatisticsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenhouse gas (GHG) is a main cause for climate anomalies, and thus, declining GHG emissions becomes an essential task for enterprises, especially for international liner shipping companies, to achieve the goal of corporate social responsibility (CSR). To liner shipping companies, main emitting gases are CO2, SOx, and NOx that cause marine pollution and global warming. To decline environmental warming and marine pollution, efficiency measure about GHG emissions for liner shipping companies is important. Due to data specifications of GHG, slack-based measure (SBM) data envelopment analysis (DEA) and super SBM DEA models focus on undesirable outputs are proposed and integrated into new DEA models. Through these models above, GHG emissions of liner shipping companies for varied years viewed as peer decision-making units (DMUs) are measured. Then, relative efficient DMUs are useful references for GHG emissions of liner shipping companies in emitting policies and technologies to reduce marine pollution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINFOR Information Systems and Operational ResearchSame topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207