Meta-transcriptomics Reveals Dysbiosis of the Respiratory Microbiome in Older Adults with Long COVID
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited research has investigated the connection between long COVID (LC) and the respiratory microbiome, particularly in older adults. This study aimed to characterize the respiratory microbiome of older LC patients (with an average age of 65 years old), through meta-transcriptomic sequencing of 201 individual samples. Marked differences in microbial diversity were observed between LC and non-LC patients, including disruptions in both pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Importantly, viral taxa, such as Herpes simplex virus type 1 and Human coronavirus 229E , were more frequently detected in LC patients, indicating the vulnerability of LC patients to viral infections. Functional annotation at the expression level revealed notable differences in microbial metabolism with alterations observed in pathways related to tryptophan–serotonin metabolism in LC patients. These findings underscore the altered microbial landscape, especially in older adults who developed LC, and fill the gap for the potentially clinical roles played by the respiratory microbiome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it