Coplanar capacitive sensing for nondestructive evaluation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amongst various nondestructive evaluation techniques, coplanar capacitive sensing offers key advantages: it is singlesided, non-contact, and capable of investigating both electrically conductive and insulating materials. Although this technique has been a research topic for nearly two decades, its use for nondestructive evaluation applications is still considered an emerging technology. This is due to multiple factors – beyond just the dielectric properties of the test piece – that can affect capacitance. The present work discusses the principles of capacitive sensing and potential probe design selection based on numerical simulations. Numerical models were employed for probe optimization, with a focus on sensitivity to electric permittivity and lift-off. Additionally, applications of the technique in evaluating tile misalignment in ceramic armor arrays, as well as inspecting composite aircraft structures subjected to lightning strikes are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it