Indoor Air Quality Assessment Through IoT Sensor Technology: A Montreal–Qatar Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses the need for effective, real-time monitoring of indoor air quality, a critical factor for health and environmental well-being. The aim is to develop an affordable, Arduino-based IoT sensor system capable of continuous measurement of key air pollutants, including CO2, PM2.5, NO2, and VOCs. The system integrates multiple sensors and transmits data to an online server, where it is stored in a MySQL database for analysis and visualization. Validation studies conducted at Concordia University and Qatar University confirm the system’s accuracy and reliability, with discrepancies reduced to under 15% through calibration and adjustment techniques. Comparative analysis with commercial monitoring instruments reveals strong correlations and negligible deviations, supporting the system’s validity for real-time air quality monitoring. The system also includes a user-friendly interface that displays real-time data through intuitive charts and tables, along with an indoor air quality index to help users assess and address air pollution levels. The system demonstrates a 90% cost reduction versus commercial tools while maintaining a mean deviation of <15% across climatic extremes. Its combination of comprehensive sensors, data visualization tools, and an air quality index makes it an effective tool for environmental monitoring and decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".