MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410304563 · doi:10.1128/jcm.00121-25

The dark matter of bacterial genomic surveillance—antimicrobial resistance plasmid transmissions in the hospital setting

2025· article· en· W4410304563 on OpenAlexaff
Annika Sobkowiak, Vera Schwierzeck, Vincent van Almsick, Natalie Effelsberg, Franziska Schuler, Kyrylo Bessonov, James A. Robertson, Dag Harmsen, Alexander Mellmann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmidMultilocus sequence typingBiologyTransmission (telecommunications)TypingAntibiotic resistanceGenomeWhole genome sequencingMultiple drug resistanceMolecular epidemiologyGeneticsMicrobiologyDrug resistanceGeneBacteriaGenotypeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissemination of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global public health burden. The aim of this study was to characterize AMR plasmid transmissions within a tertiary care hospital and identify relevant AMR plasmid transmission pathways. During an 18-month observation period, 540 clinical gram-negative multidrug-resistant bacterial (MDRB) isolates were collected during routine hospital surveillance and subjected to Pacific Biosciences long-read whole genome sequencing. Potential clonal transmissions were determined based on core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST), and plasmid transmissions were detected using a novel real-time applicable tool for plasmid transmission detection. Potential transmissions were validated using epidemiological data. Among the 471 eligible MDRB isolates, we detected 1,539 plasmids; 84.41% of these were circularized. We identified 38 potential clonal transmissions in 24 clusters based on cgMLST and 121 potential plasmid transmissions in 24 clusters containing genetically related AMR plasmids. Among the latter clusters, 10 contained different multilocus sequence types (involving 2-38 isolates, median: 3 isolates), and nine contained multiple species (2-18 isolates, median: 4). Epidemiological data confirmed 19 clonal transmissions (in seven clusters) and an additional 12 plasmid transmissions (within eight plasmid clusters). Among these, we identified seven cases of intra-host and five patient-to-patient plasmid transmissions. We demonstrate that intra-host and patient-to-patient transmissions of AMR plasmids can be identified by combining long-read sequencing with real-time applicable tools during routine molecular surveillance. In addition, our study highlights that more than a decade of bacterial genomic surveillance missed at least one-third of all AMR transmission events due to plasmids. IMPORTANCE: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat to human health. Most AMR determinants are encoded extra-chromosomally on plasmids. Although current infection control strategies primarily focus on clonal transmission of multidrug-resistant bacteria, until today, AMR plasmid transmission routes are neither understood nor analyzed in the hospital setting. In our study, we simultaneously determined both clonal, that is, based on chromosomes, and AMR plasmid transmissions during routine molecular surveillance by combining long-read sequencing with a novel real-time applicable software tool and validated all potential transmission events with epidemiological data. Our analysis determined not only the yet unknown plasmid transmissions within healthcare facilities or within the community but also resulted, in addition to the clonal transmissions, in at least a third more transmissions due to AMR plasmids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207