Biochemical basis of endogenous bioluminescent springtail <i>Lobella sauteri</i> (Collembola)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bioluminescence plays important roles among animals in both intra- and inter-species communication. A variety of bioluminescent organisms inhabit soil environments, even in areas where light penetration is minimal. However, due to the lack of a model system to study underground bioluminescence, the biology and molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain largely unknown. Springtails (Collembola) are representative soil animals, and we recently identified Lobella sauteri (Neanuridae) as a bioluminescent species. L. sauteri can be maintained over multiple generations under laboratory conditions on a single food source, the plasmodium Fuligo septica, with a generation time of approximately 3 months. Bioluminescence was observed in all developmental stages of L. sauteri in laboratory-raised populations. The light emission exhibited periodic changes and increased before ecdysis, coinciding with the whitening of its tubercles. The bioluminescent reaction in vitro requires a small molecular (luciferin) fraction, an enzyme (luciferase) fraction, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and Mg2+. Comparative transcriptomic and biochemical analyses suggest that L. sauteri employs a novel endogenous bioluminescent molecular mechanism. We propose that L. sauteri provides a valuable research opportunity for investigating novel bioluminescence systems and underground light-based communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".