MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410307162 · doi:10.1177/10935266251338562

Pneumatoceles or Not? Case Reports on Pulmonary Cystic Lesions in Infants

2025· article· en· W4410307162 on OpenAlexaff
F.D. Birru, Anne Hicks, Jake Mandziuk, Ioana Bratu

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiologyLungDifferential diagnosisPneumatoceleLesionHigh-resolution computed tomographyPulmonary sequestrationComputed tomographyPathologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary cystic lesions in infants are uncommon and can present diagnostic challenges due to overlapping radiologic features with other cystic lung conditions. We present 2 cases of left lung cystic lesions in infants. Initial high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) suggested differential diagnoses, including pneumatocele, type I congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM), or a solitary cystic lymphangioma. Definitive diagnosis was achieved through histopathological examination after left lower lobectomy and resection of the lesion. These cases highlight the challenges in accurately diagnosing pulmonary cystic lesions, given the limitations of imaging alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207