RFID Sensor with Integrated Energy Harvesting for Wireless Measurement of dc Magnetic Fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-voltage direct-current (HVdc) transmission lines are gaining more attention as an integral part of modern power system networks. Monitoring the dc current is important for metering and the development of dynamic line rating control schemes. However, this has been a challenging task, and there is a need for wireless sensing methods with high accuracy and a dynamic range. Conventional methods require direct contact with the high-voltage conductors and utilize bulky and complex equipment. In this paper, an ultra-high-frequency (UHF) radio frequency identification (RFID)-based sensor is introduced for the monitoring of the dc current of an HVdc transmission line. The sensor is composed of a passive RFID tag with a custom-designed antenna, integrated with a Hall effect magnetic field device and an RF power harvesting unit. The dc current is measured by monitoring the dc magnetic field around the conductor using the Hall effect device. The internal memory of the RFID tag is encoded with the magnetic field data. The entire RFID sensor can be wirelessly powered and interrogated using a conventional RFID reader. The advantage of this approach is that the sensor does not require batteries and does not need additional maintenance during its lifetime. This is an important feature in a high-voltage environment where any maintenance requires either an outage or special equipment. In this paper, the detailed design of the RFID sensor is presented, including the antenna design and measurements for both the RFID tag and the RF harvesting section, the microcontroller interfacing design and testing, the magnetic field sensor calibration, and the RF power harvesting section. The UHF RFID-based magnetic field sensor was fabricated and tested using a laboratory experimental setup. In the experiment, a 40 mm-diameter-aluminum conductor, typically used in 500 kV HVdc transmission lines carrying a dc current of up to 1200 A, was used to conduct dc current tests for the fabricated sensor. The sensor was placed near the conductor such that the Hall effect device was close to the surface of the conductor, and readings were acquired by the RFID reader. The sensitivity of the entire RFID sensor was 30 mV/mT, with linear behavior over a magnetic flux density range from 0 mT to 4.5 mT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".