MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410309110 · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2025.1547231

Ligand-receptor dynamics in heterophily-aware graph neural networks for enhanced cell type prediction from single-cell RNA-seq data

2025· article· en· W4410309110 on OpenAlexaff
Lian Duan, Mahshad Hashemi, Alioune Ngom, Luis Rueda

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational biologyRNA-SeqLigand (biochemistry)CellRNAComputer scienceReceptorNeuroscienceChemistryBiological systemBiologyArtificial intelligenceTranscriptomeGeneticsGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful tools for analyzing structured data, particularly in domains where relationships and interactions between entities are key. By leveraging the inherent graph structure in datasets, GNNs excel in capturing complex dependencies and patterns that traditional neural networks might miss. This advantage is especially pronounced in the field of computational biology, where the intricate connections between biological entities play a crucial role. In this context, Our work explores the application of GNNs to single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data, a domain characterized by complex and heterogeneous relationships. By extracting ligand-receptor (L-R) associations from LIANA and constructing Cell-Cell association networks with varying edge homophily ratios, based on L-R information, we enhance the biological relevance and accuracy of depicting cellular communication pathways. While standard GNN models like Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN), GraphSAGE, Graph Attention Networks (GAT), and MixHop often assume homophily (similar nodes are more likely to be connected), this assumption does not always hold in biological networks. To address this, we explore advanced graph neural network methods, such as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="m1"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> Graph Convolutional Networks and Gated Bi-Kernel GNNs (GBK-GNN), that are specifically designed to handle heterophilic data. Our study spans across six diverse datasets, enabling a thorough comparison between heterophily-aware GNNs and traditional homophily-assuming models, including Multi-Layer Perceptrons, which disregards graph structure entirely. Our findings highlight the importance of considering data-specific characteristics in GNN applications, demonstrating that heterophily-focused methods can effectively decipher the complex patterns within scRNA-seq data. By integrating multi-omics data, including gene expression profiles and L-R interactions, we pave the way for more accurate and insightful analyses in computational biology, offering a more comprehensive understanding of cellular environments and interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Molecular BiosciencesSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207