MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410310190 · doi:10.63564/jha.v14n1p42

Managing absenteeism among pregnant healthcare workers: A case from Croatia’s Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka

2025· article· en· W4410310190 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hrvoje Lalić

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Administration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsenteeismMedicineHealth careHealthcare workerFamily medicineObstetricsNursingEmergency medicinePsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The case aimed to highlight the increasing absenteeism among pregnant medical workers employed at the Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Croatia. The paper proposed and implemented measures to reduce this trend through coordinated efforts involving the contracted outpatient Occupational Medicine, the Hospital Personnel Department, and the Occupational Safety Department. Methods: A descriptive approach was used to assess the current state of pregnancy-related absenteeism, which fluctuated up to 3% annually of the total 3,500 hospital employees, of whom 81% were females. Results: Immediate action by contracted outpatient Occupational Medicine introduced a selective approach to granting temporary incapacity leave only when the workplace posed a genuine threat to maternal and fetal health. In collaboration with the Occupational Safety Department, temporary reassignment to less hazardous roles was implemented, minimizing absenteeism. Conclusions: The implementation of governmental measures in March 2025, granting significant benefits to pregnant employees, risked straining hospital operations, possibly leading to department closures given the female-dominated workforce. Adhering to Occupational Medicine evaluations and strategically reassigning pregnant workers helped mitigate these risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital AdministrationSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207