MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410311362 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.150305

Proactive MiDLAF: A Novel Mining MinHash-Deep Learning Approach for Advanced Spam Email Filtering

2025· article· en· W4410311362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fryal Jassim Abd Al-Razaq, Ali Kadhim Bermani, Ali Khalid Ali, Mehdi Ebady Manaa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spam email filtering has recently become the most important task helping in maintaining secure and efficient communication systems.As spam emails lead to security leach, reduced productivity, and increased storage costs, this paper is intended to present a proactive approach to spam email classification, leveraging the advanced techniques to increase detection accuracy and efficiency.The proposed work consists of the three steps.The preprocessing step introduces MinHash which provides a small signature matrix for fast approximation based on a k-shingle technique that generates overlapping sequences of k word, effectively capturing the context and nuances of the spam email text.The second step uses the advanced techniques of machine learning (ML) Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) for deep learning (DL) to classify ham and spam emails.The outcomes illustrate that combining the k-shingle, MinHash with advanced text for feeding ML and DL results in high accuracy rate compared with the other works where the SVM classifiers achieves accuracy rate of 98.95% highlighting its effectiveness in distinguishing between ham and spam emails.Other ML shows competitive performance, With MLP 98.25%, RF 95.6%, Logistic regression 98%, DT 93.3%, and lowest accuracy with KNN 70.1%.DL satisfies a high accuracy rate up to 96.1%.This work contributes to the development of a scalable and reliable solution for spam filtering in modern communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207