MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410314202 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf758

Radio continuum spectra of SFGs in the XMM-LSS Field below threshold

2025· article· en· W4410314202 on OpenAlexafffund
E F Ocran, A. R. Taylor, J. M. Stil, M. Vaccari, Srikrishna Sekhar, C. H. Ishwara‐Chandra, Jae-Woo Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Cape TownKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteUniversity of PretoriaUniversity of the Western CapeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of India
KeywordsPhysicsSpectral lineAstrophysicsField (mathematics)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study investigates the radio spectral properties of K$_{S}$-selected star-forming galaxies (SFGs) in the XMM-LSS (multimirror mission large-scale structure) field using extensive multiwavelength data. By employing various diagnostics, SFGs are distinguished from quiescent galaxies and AGN across seven redshift bins ($\rm {0.1\le \, {\rm z}\, \le \, 3.0}$). The broad-band radio frequency spectral energy distribution is analysed at observer-frame frequencies from 144 to 1500 MHz using median stacking techniques correcting for median flux boosting. We investigate the relationship between the radio spectral index, $\alpha$ (where $S\propto \nu ^{\alpha }$) and redshift (z). Our analysis reveals no significant inverse correlation between $\alpha$ and z, indicating that the radio spectrum remains independent with varying redshift. We fit the stacked median radio SEDs with a power law (PL), curved power law (CPL), and double power-law (DPL) models. For the DPL and CPL models, we observe a consistent steepening of the low-frequency spectral index across all redshift bins. For the CPL model, the curvature term q is greater than zero in all redshift bins. Model comparisons indicate that spectra are generally well fitted by all the models considered. At 1500 MHz, SFGs display both a steep synchrotron component and a flat free–free emission component, with a thermal fraction consistently around 11 per cent to 18 per cent. Further deep radio observations, with higher resolution to better deal with source blending and confusion noise and wider frequency coverage to better separate non-thermal and thermal radio emission, are required to reveal the detailed physical processes, thus clarifying the nature of radio sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207