Bibliographic record
Abstract
Creatoon is a participatory two-dimensional animation that emphasizes creative storytelling. Fusing the words “Create” and “Cartoon”, the project encourages its viewers to participate in creating their own stories by watching an animated video. In lieu of providing dialogue and characters’ names, this project converts still images of a comic into a movable video. To move and change the positions of the characters, the video zooms in and out, shifts scale, and animates lip movement by using Adobe After Effects. In addition, the artist incorporates background music to assist the viewers, who are children ages five to twelve, in making their stories. Participants begin by watching the video clip and are then prompted to name the characters and imagine and write their own stories. The central objective is to provide children with a digital space in which their creativity can flourish and demonstrate how a single video has the potential to carry multiple stories. Furthermore, through participation, the project enables its viewers to immerse in innovation in the space of digital media. Creatoon challenges the passive nature of content common to digital media platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".