MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410318088 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf179

“I Didn’t Know Him Before the Pandemic… Now He's on My Speed Dial”: Strengthening Collaboration Between Infectious Diseases Physicians and State and Local Public Health for Future Public Health Emergencies

2025· article· en· W4410318088 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Valencia, Leslie Edwards, Libby Horter, H J Turner, M. B. Vaidya, Ty Johnson, Eli Briggs, Dana S. Wollins, Shu Phua, Arnold Y. Chen, Suzanne Felt-Lisk, William A. Werbel, Alice I Kim, Sarah Lim, John B. Lynch, Mary Foote, Zanthia Wiley, Julie Vaishampayan, Pragna Patel, Scott Santibañez

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsHillsborough Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthMedicinePreparednessPandemicHealth carePublic relationsCornerstoneNursingInfectious disease (medical specialty)Family medicineMedical emergencyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseasePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Infectious diseases (ID) physicians play a crucial role in public health emergencies. Effective collaboration between public health agencies and healthcare providers is essential for a coordinated response. However, there is limited information on how ID physicians and health departments collaborate and which areas need to be improved. Here, we identify ways to enhance public health preparedness through increased collaboration between ID physicians and state, tribal, local, and territorial health departments. METHODS: We performed a secondary qualitative analysis of 37 telephone interviews conducted using a semistructured discussion guide. Interviews were conducted from July 2023 through September 2023 as part of a pandemic preparedness needs assessment by the Infectious Diseases Society of America's COVID-19 Real-Time Learning Network. Participants included ID physicians (n = 13), public health workers (n = 7), healthcare facility-based pandemic leaders (n = 7), and national stakeholders (n = 10). RESULTS: While some jurisdictions had robust connections between ID physicians and public health staff, lack of coordination in other areas led to duplication of efforts, confusion, and underutilization of resources. Respondents indicated that collaboration can be strengthened over time. Recommendations included better data systems, standardized reporting procedures, early dissemination of updates, and training of ID physicians in the incident command structure and media communication. CONCLUSIONS: The opportunity to build on institutional knowledge from the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic will be lost without a commitment of time, resources, and planning. Public health officials can use this experience as a catalyst for building strong collaborative relationships between ID physicians and public health practitioners, a cornerstone of future pandemic response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicPublic Health Policies and EducationFrench-language works237,207