Research on "Ideological and Political Education (IPE) in the Curriculum" Reform Practice—The Course: "Digital Marketing of Financial Products" as an Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on the "Ideological and Political Education in the Curriculum"(IPE) reform practice of the course "Digital Marketing of Financial Products" and elaborates in detail how to deeply integrate IPE elements into the whole course teaching. Through the implementation of the overall course design plan, the paper explores the IPE - oriented education approach of "Course - Workplace Requirement - Qualification Certificate - IPE Elements" integration and realizes the organic unity of knowledge transmission and value guidance. The research adopts a variety of teaching methods and means, such as case, Q&A, and OBE approaches, and combines information resources to create a learning environment for students where they can "Acquire Knowledge and IPE Anytime and Anywhere". The article can have a positive impact on the professional training of teachers and students, scientific research, technical exchanges, and social services, which provides valuable experiences and examples for the IPE reform practices around the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".