MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410321249 · doi:10.1111/evj.14534

Volume kinetics of lactated Ringer's solution in adult horses

2025· article· en· W4410321249 on OpenAlexaff
William W. Muir, Xiu Ting Yiew, Shane Bateman, Robert G. Hahn

Bibliographic record

VenueEquine Veterinary Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersLincoln Memorial UniversityOhio State University
KeywordsVolume of distributionBolus (digestion)AlbuminDistribution VolumeAnesthesiaPharmacokineticsMedicineBlood pressureRinger's solutionBlood volumeHemodynamicsHeart rateChemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Fluid therapy in horses is primarily empirical. Evidence-based quantification of the disposition of intravenous (IV) crystalloids used in clinical practice could enhance the effectiveness of fluid therapy. OBJECTIVES: To determine the pharmacokinetics (i.e., volume kinetics: VK) and associated haemodynamic effects of IV lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) in adult euvolemic horses. STUDY DESIGN: Unmasked multiple subjects, single baseline design. METHODS: Thirteen healthy, euvolemic adult female horses were administered an IV bolus of LRS and monitored over 4 h. Haemoglobin, albumin and haematocrit concentrations were used to generate VK parameter estimates through a non-linear mixed effects model and stepwise covariate testing. Cardiorespiratory effects, hormonal parameters and urine output were monitored. RESULTS: Administration of an IV bolus of LRS increased heart rate and systolic arterial pressure. Kinetic analysis was based on plasma albumin, as fluctuations in haemoglobin concentration suggested splenic recruitment of erythrocytes. Fluid disposition was best described by a two-volume fluid space model. Covariate analysis showed that a high systolic arterial pressure is associated with a decrease in urine output, and that haemoglobin recruitment was associated with the transfer of fluid from the central compartment, which was estimated to be 26.2 L, to a peripheral space. Kinetic constants showed rapid fluid distribution to the peripheral compartment and slow return to the central compartment, impeding fluid elimination from the body. Distribution of LRS from the central compartment was rapid but elimination from the body was slow. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Limited sample size and sample collection duration may have influenced model selection and covariate identification. CONCLUSIONS: Volume kinetics provides a method for quantitatively describing the volume expanding effects of administered fluids. Fluid infusion is associated with an increase in heart rate and arterial blood pressure. Volume kinetic analysis offers a context-dependent method for developing and refining more effective fluid infusion protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEquine Veterinary JournalSame topicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207