MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410324123 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2024.100

A petrologically constrained timeframe for early dolomitization in the mixed carbonate–siliciclastic Miocene Dam Formation, Qatar

2025· article· en· W4410324123 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Al-Musawi, John M. Rivers, Stephen E. Kaczmarek

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolomitizationGeologySiliciclasticGeochemistryCarbonatePetrologyGeomorphologyFaciesMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The timing of dolomitization is difficult to constrain. Many studies suggest that it is early, but the rates at which dolomitization occurs in nature are rarely defined. This study aims to pinpoint the timing of dolomitization in sedimentary environments using detailed petrography and sedimentological observations from two near-surface research cores in the lower part of the Dam Formation (lower Dam) in southwestern Qatar. The lower Dam, deposited in a shallow-marine–estuarine setting with frequent sea-level fluctuations, presents strong sedimentological and stratigraphic constraints for the timing of dolomitization. The highly variable environmental conditions resulted in deposition of marine to brackish-water carbonates, land-derived siliciclastics, and intermittent subaerial exposure, creating a high-frequency cyclicity that allows for cycle-by-cycle diagenetic analysis in stratigraphically distinct depositional units. Observations from core and thin-section petrography permit the identification of five distinct lithofacies, which are classified as either carbonate-dominated or siliciclastic-dominated lithotypes. Dolomite, the most abundant mineral in the carbonate-dominated intervals, occurs as a fabric-retentive very fine crystalline (VFxn) or isopachous dolomite. Crosscutting relationships in each stratigraphically distinct depositional unit indicate that replacive dolomite predates all other diagenetic mineral phases, including palygorskite, illite, quartz cement, pyrite, and exposure-related blocky and poikilotopic calcite cements. Diagenetic calcite cements are most abundant immediately below exposure surfaces, gradually decrease in abundance down section, and are generally absent directly above exposure surfaces. Collectively, these observations imply that blocky and poikilotopic calcite cements postdate dolomitization, supporting a model where dolomitization of a given depositional cycle occurred syndepositionally, before the deposition of the overlying cycle. With an estimated deposition rate of the Dam Formation of between ∼ 5.6 ± 1.4 and 3.3 ± 0.9 cm kyr−1, dolomitization in some cycles likely occurred in ∼ 5.4 ± 1.4 to 9.1 ± 2.3 kyr, consistent with findings from Holocene dolomite studies, and considerably shorter (< 100×) than those extrapolated from high-temperature laboratory experiments. The findings from this study imply that sedimentary carbonates can be dolomitized relatively rapidly on a cycle-by-cycle basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207