Bibliographic record
Abstract
gene is found to have different variants in patients suffering chronic pain or insensitivity to pain due to the gain-of-function or loss-of-function of Nav1.8 channels. In animal models of chronic pain, Nav1.8 is also verified to be involved, suggesting that Nav1.8 may be a potential target for treatment of chronic pain. Another voltage-gated sodium channel, Nav1.7, is also proposed to be a target for chronic pain, supported by clinical findings in patients and laboratory animal models; however, there is no Nav1.7-specific drug that has passed clinical trials, although they demonstrated satisfactory effects in laboratory animals. This discrepancy between clinical and preclinical studies may be related to the differences between humans and laboratory animals or due to the degeneracy in different sodium channels governing the DRG neuronal excitability, which is thought of as the underlying machinery of chronic pain and mostly studied. This review summarizes recent findings of Nav1.8 in chronic pain from clinics and laboratories and discusses the difference, which may be helpful for future investigation of Nav1.8 in chronic pain, considering the dilemma of the Nav1.7 channel in chronic pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".