MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410326976 · doi:10.2147/ppa.s516304

Predictors of Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, and Cardiovascular Screening Among Saudis at Primary Healthcare Settings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2025· article· en· W4410326976 on OpenAlexaff
Naif Mohammed Alhawiti, Mamdouh M. Shubair, Seema Mohammed Nasser, Amani Alharthy, Badr F. Al-Khateeb, Fatmah Othman, Awad Alshahrani, Lubna Alnaim, Abdulmajeed Abdullah Abukhamis, Noof Alwatban, Ashraf El‐Metwally

Bibliographic record

VenuePatient Preference and Adherence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersKing Fahad Medical City
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressurePrimary health carePrimary careCholesterolTraditional medicineFamily medicineInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: This study was conducted to estimate proportion of individuals undergoing screening for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its risk factors and to identify predictors of CVD, blood pressure, and blood cholesterol screening. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 48 primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia and 14,239 participants were enrolled. The analysis was performed in SPSS version 26 and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% Cis were reported. Results: Blood pressure screening was reported by 35.3%, cholesterol screening by 9.3%, and cardiovascular screening by 3.7%. Significant positive predictors for blood pressure screening included older age (50-75 years: AOR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.20-1.50; ≥75 years: AOR 2.12, 95% CI: 1.84-2.43), being married (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.04-1.27), non-smoking (AOR: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.79-2.17), physical activity (AOR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.05-1.28), and diabetes (AOR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.88-2.44). For cholesterol screening, significant positive predictors were older age (≥75 years: AOR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.56-2.29), unemployment (AOR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.45), insurance coverage (AOR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.33-1.74), smoking (AOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.14-1.53), diabetes history (AOR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.09-1.61), and hypertension (AOR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.36-2.02). For cardiovascular screening, significant positive predictors included older age (≥75 years: AOR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.35-2.43), unemployment (AOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.24-1.88), insurance coverage (AOR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.27-1.92), smoking (AOR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.52-2.34), diabetes (AOR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.41-2.43), and high cholesterol (AOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.31-2.36). Conclusion: A very low proportion of Saudi residents have undergone blood pressure, cholesterol, and CVD screening. Common predictors of screening included older age, insurance coverage, diabetes, hypertension, physical activity, and high cholesterol levels. Low prevalence of screening is alarming, and Saudi Government needs to implement strategies that can help increase proportion of Saudi residents who receive blood pressure, cholesterol, and CVD screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePatient Preference and AdherenceSame topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207