Positive Parenting as a Moderator of the Association Between Alexithymia and Adolescent Aggression
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study aimed to examine the moderating role of positive parenting in the relationship between alexithymia and aggression among students. This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on students in Khorramabad city during the 2023-2024 academic year. A total of 155 participants were selected using a multi-stage cluster sampling method. Data collection tools included the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), the Anger and Aggression Scale by Neislon et al. (2000), and the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (1991). Data were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and hierarchical regression analysis. The results revealed a significant relationship between alexithymia and aggression tendencies among students. Additionally, positive parenting played a moderating role in the relationship between alexithymia and aggression tendencies. Based on the findings, alexithymia significantly increases students’ tendency toward aggression. High levels of positive parenting can mitigate the negative effects of alexithymia, whereas low levels of positive parenting may exacerbate these effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it