MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410329388 · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105077

Luminescence-based techniques to monitor pre-, post-harvest and processing changes in fresh produce and derivatives: Principles, applications and trends

2025· article· en· W4410329388 on OpenAlexafffund
Sachin Kumar Singh, K. Wang, Chen Chen, Maria G. Corradini

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Food Science & Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArrell Food Institute, University of GuelphCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Agri-Food Innovation AllianceUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsLuminescenceComputer scienceMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceNanotechnologyOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Maintaining and ensuring food safety and quality of fresh or minimally processed produce is a priority for producers, distributors, suppliers and consumers. The transient nature and dynamism of the produce supply chain and the high perishability of the products require rapid, cost-effective and noninvasive methods for monitoring food integrity (quality, safety and identity) along the supply chain. Scope and approach This review covers luminescence-based methods that target intrinsic or extrinsic fluorophores as reporters of food safety, freshness, and authenticity and the requirements for assessment of these attributes in produce at pre- and post-harvest stages. Key findings Steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy, excitation-emission matrices (EEMs), and hyperspectral imaging in fluorescence mode (HSI) offer in-line capabilities due to advances in data acquisition and processing. This includes relevant feature extraction, classification, and modeling using machine learning and mechanistic approaches. Advances in data integration, wireless networks and cloud-based computing can enhance the applicability of these methods to monitor and inform continuous and effective decision-making along the supply chain and assist in providing feedback to virtual objects/systems such as digital twins. The use of spatially resolved techniques other than HSI, such as Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) or super-resolution microscopy (SRM), although underexplored in foods, offers a powerful option to explore mechanisms that affect food integrity in fresh produce at pre- and post-harvest stages. Significance and conclusions Luminescence-based methods can significantly improve supply chain transparency and inform advanced supply chain modeling by providing quick, low-cost, in-line capabilities to identify and mitigate future safety and quality breaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in Food Science & TechnologySame topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207