MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410333916 · doi:10.1055/s-0045-1809269

Effects of Mirikizumab Versus Placebo on Histologic Inflammation Evaluated by Comprehensive Assessment in 5 Intestinal Segments in a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Participants with Crohn’s Disease

2025· article· en· W4410333916 on OpenAlexaff
Vipul Jairath, Fernando Magro, Gert De Hertogh, B. Feagan, Noam Harpaz, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Geert D’Haens, Rish K. Pai, Nathan Morris, Marijana Protić, Kam‐Lun Ellis Hon, Claire Owen, Rodrigo Escobar, Walter Reinisch

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Gastroenterologie · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrohn's diseasePlaceboRandomized controlled trialDiseaseInternal medicineMedicineInflammationCrohn diseaseGastroenterologyPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Introduction: Mirikizumab (MIRI) increased histologic response (H-Res) and remission (H-Rem) relative to placebo (PBO) in the Phase 2 SERENITY trial. Material and Methods Methods: We compared the effect of MIRI on H-Res and H-Rem at week (W)12 and W52 to PBO by composite endpoints of response (clinical response by Patient-Reported Outcome [PRO] at W12 and W52 H-Res) and of remission (clinical response by PRO at W12 and W52 H-Rem) at W52. The overall population of patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn’s Disease (CD), including those without prior biologic failure (non-BF), and those with prior BF were assessed, using data from the Phase 3 VIVID-1 trial (NCT03926130). Two biopsy specimens from each of the five intestinal segments (one ileal and four colonic) were obtained from the edge of ulcers, or the most inflamed mucosa from randomized patients at screening, W12, and W52. Clinical response by PRO was defined as≥30% decrease in stool frequency and/or abdominal pain with neither score worse than baseline. Results Results: At W12, treatment with MIRI resulted in nominally statistically significantly higher rates of H-Res in all three patient groups analyzed (p<.001) ([ Table 1 ]). At W12, differences between MIRI vs PBO were nominally significant in achieving H-Rem in all patients (p<.01) and in non-BF and BF patients (both p<.05). For W52 composite H-Res, differences between MIRI vs PBO were nominally statistically significant in all patient groups examined (p<.001). For W52 composite H-Rem, nominally statistically significant differences between MIRI vs PBO were observed in all patients (p<.001), in non-BF patients (p<.05), and in BF patients (p<.001). Table 1 Effects of Mirikizumab Versus Placebo on Histologic Inflammation Evaluated by Comprehensive Assessment in 5 Intestinal Segments in a Randomized Controlled Phase 3 Trial of Participants with Crohn’s Disease All patients Without Prior Biologic failure With Prior Biologic Failure PBO (N=199) MIRI (N=579) Difference (95% CI) PBO (N=91) MIRI (N=273) Difference (95% CI) PBO (N=88) MIRI (N=255) Difference (95% CI) W12 H-Res 30.7 52.7 22.2 (14.6-29.7)*** 37.4 58.6 21.2 (9.7-32.8)*** 22.7 47.8 25.1 (14.4-35.8)*** W12 H-Rem 12.1 22.1 10.2 (4.7-15.7)** 14.3 27.5 13.2 (4.3-22.1)* 4.5 12.2 7.6 (1.7-13.5)* W52 Composite H-Res 16.1 44.4 28.2 (21.6-34.7)*** 26.4 46.5 20.1 (9.3-31.0)*** 6.8 45.9 39.1 (31.0-47.1)*** W52 Composite H-Rem 8.5 23.3 14.7 (9.5-19.9)*** 14.3 24.9 10.6 (1.8-19.5)* 2.3 21.6 19.3 (13.4-25.2)*** Data are%;*p<.05;**p<.01;***p<.001 vs PBO “Without prior biologic failure“ and “With prior biologic failure“ were subgroups of all patients with active histologic disease at baseline. P-values for “All patients” were from the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test adjusting for baseline covariates. P-values for the “Without prior biologic failure“ and “With prior biologic failure“ subgroups were from the Fisher's exact test. H-Res=absence of epithelial neutrophils and epithelial damage, erosions, and ulceration or≥50% decrease in either the sum of the 5 segments of Robarts Histopathology Index or the Global Histologic Disease Activity Score. H-Rem=complete absence of mucosal neutrophils (in epithelium and lamina propria), and no epithelial damage, erosions, and ulcers. CI=confidence interval; H=histologic; MIRI=mirikizumab; PBO=placebo; Rem=remission; Res=response; W=week Conclusion Conclusions: Based upon strict definitions that applied to all 5 intestinal segments, MIRI achieved nominally significantly higher rates of H-Res and H-Rem compared to PBO in all patients at W12 and W52. The statistical difference was more pronounced in the BF population after one year of treatment. Publication History Article published online: 13 May 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für GastroenterologieSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207