MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410334208 · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105565

COVID-19 and urban poor communities in Metro Manila: Social vulnerability and the ‘pasaway’

2025· article· en· W4410334208 on OpenAlexaff
Pauline Eadie, Nymia Pimentel Simbulan, Yvonne Su, Chester Yacub

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersUniversity of Nottingham
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Vulnerability (computing)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Social vulnerabilityGeographyPandemicEnvironmental healthEnvironmental planningSocioeconomicsVirologySociologyMedicineOutbreakComputer securityComputer scienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the impact of the Philippine government’s response to COVID-19 on urban poor communities in Metro Manila. The central government's response to COVID-19 was militarised and this left many socially vulnerable urban poor families with a dilemma. They faced either violating quarantine regulations and risking arrest in the pursuit of their livelihood or starving at home. Quarantine violators were cast in the role of ‘ pasaway ’ or ‘undeserving poor’ by President Duterte. Drawing on evidence from 38 interviews with community leaders, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) staff members and public servants, we argue that those most in need of social protection during the COVID-19 response were often the least likely to get it. We examine how local government agencies, NGOs, and those living in the communities worked towards meeting material needs and countered some of the effects of the militarisation of the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207