MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410335257 · doi:10.1117/12.3052525

Porous triboelectric nanogenerator to enhance self-powered load monitoring of total knee replacement

2025· article· en· W4410335257 on OpenAlexaff
Elham Mahmoudi, Adam Garry Redgrift, Emre Salman, Milutin Stanaćević, Ryan Willing, Shahrzad Towfighian

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriboelectric effectNanogeneratorAutomotive engineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltageComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing self-powered, durable pressure sensors for Total Knee Replacement (TKR) enhances longevity, ensures consistent performance, and provides critical post-operative information. This study presents a triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) integrated into an instrumented knee implant for energy harvesting and pressure sensing. Operating in vertical contact mode, it utilizes porous silicone rubber (SR) dielectric to improve electrical stability, and mechanical durability. The nanogenerator divides the tibial tray into two compartments for load imbalance detection. Tests simulating human walking showed the device withstands forces up to 2200N, generating a maximum of 18μW at 1Hz under harmonic load and a maximum of 7.5μW at 0.8Hz under gait loading with a VIVO joint simulator. The performance of the TENG was stable over 3000 cycles generating a peak-to-peak voltage of 350V . The porous structure enhances charge trapping, energy storage, and system efficiency. The increased power compared to previous work enhances energy harvesting capability and strengthens its potential for self-powered, real-time load monitoring at the knee joint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials→French-language works237,207→