MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410335637 · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/add85d

Surface blackening phenomenon and formation mechanism in high-temperature annealed nickel-based superalloys

2025· article· en· W4410335637 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Yang, Zhicheng Cheng, Wei Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Research Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsNickel Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperalloyMaterials scienceMetallurgyNickelMechanism (biology)Annealing (glass)MicrostructurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Owing to stringent service conditions, nickel-based superalloys must meet exceptionally high surface quality standards. After cold rolling, these alloys can blacken during annealing, affecting appearance and performance. The surface-element distribution of GH4169 alloy annealed under hydrogen protection was analyzed via XPS, and reaction free-energy changes were calculated using thermodynamic software. The blackened surface contained oxides and carbides, primarily Cr2O3, Cr(OH)3, TiO2, Nb2O5, NbC, and free carbon. Residual water vapor in the protective hydrogen gas and rolling-oil remnants generated C, CO2, CO, and H2O, which then reacted with the alloy during high-temperature annealing to form a blackened layer. The selective oxidation of Cr, Nb, and Ti, along with the inward diffusion of carbon, leads to the compositional differences observed in the blackened layer. Lowering the protective gas dew point, improving rolling oil, and effective degreasing eliminated blackening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Research ExpressSame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207