MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410338551 · doi:10.1306/m81928c2

Three-Dimensional Seismic Attributes Help Define Controls on Reservoir Development

2004· book-chapter· en· W4410338551 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. A. Pearson, Bruce S. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyComputer sciencePetroleum engineeringSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of three-dimensional (3-D) seismic attributes to predict reservoir properties is becoming widespread in many areas. One of the most underutilized aspects of the methodology is that the property-prediction maps can help geoscientists understand depositional and postdepositional controls on reservoir development. We illustrate this point via a case study that examines partially dolomitized, restricted to open-marine carbonates of the Ordovician Red River Formation in the Williston Basin. We tied log and seismic data, mapped key reflection events in the 3-D seismic volume, calculated the porosity thickness (thickness × sonic porosity) for the porous zone, and then correlated those data with 21 attributes. We derived a relationship between two attributes (the spectral slope from peak to maximum frequency and the ratio of positive to negative samples) and porosity thickness that yielded a 0.88 correlation coefficient between predicted and actual values. This relationship was used to predict the porosity thickness throughout the 3-D seismic area. The resulting porosity distribution shows (1) good porosity development along the flanks of structures that are associated with visible faulting or steep dips at the underlying Winnipeg level, (2) thin (~17–28 ft [~5–8.5 m]) porous zones throughout much of the field, (3) a large, off-structure porosity zone in an area without well control, and (4) small, irregularly distributed porous zones (most likely the result of noise and/or error in the predictive relationship). In areas where faults and flexures are associated with enhanced porosity development, the slope of spectral frequency attribute may be responding to fractures, with more rapid attenuation of high frequencies occurring in these areas. These observations support a diagenetic model where faults and fractures acted locally as preferential pathways for dolomitizing fluids. Away from these zones, the porosity distribution shows some porosity thickness over the entire area that is consistent to drillstem test data that shows depleted pressures in wells drilled in the early 1990s on otherwise isolated structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists eBooksSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207