MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Piecewise Interpolation Based Digital Predistortion of Power Amplifiers Across Wide Power Ranges

2025· article· en· W4410341900 on OpenAlexaff
Nizar Messaoudi, Ahmed Ben Ayed, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredistortionAmplifierInterpolation (computer graphics)PiecewisePower (physics)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsBandwidth (computing)PhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel piecewise linear interpolation scheme to enable digital predistortion (DPD) for linearizing power amplifiers (PAs) across the wide power ranges required in massive multipleinput multiple-output (mMIMO) transmitters. By interpolating between DPD coefficients corresponding to a subset of average power levels, the proposed method reduces linearization complexity and eliminates the need for frequent DPD retraining at every power operating point. Theoretical derivations of the interpolation scheme are provided, followed by experimental validation on a Gallium Nitride (GaN) PA operating at 13 GHz. The results show that interpolating DPD coefficients at four different power levels over a 17 dB range achieved an Adjacent Channel Power Ratio (ACPR) and Error Vector Magnitude (EVM) of better than -44 dB and -38 dB, respectively. This provides a favorable balance between dedicated DPD training at each power level (ACPR and EVM of better than -47 dB and -42 dB) and using a single DPD set at peak power (ACPR and EVM of better than -37 dB and -28 dB). The proposed approach offers an efficient solution for scaling DPD with power while maintaining acceptable linearity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207