MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410343441 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggaf167

The Magma plumbing system and seismo-tectonics of the Guatemala–Mexico triple junction as revealed by the seismicity of the Tacaná volcano before and after the 2017 <i>M</i>w8.2 Chiapas earthquake

2025· article· en· W4410343441 on OpenAlexaff
D. Legrand, Mathieu Perton, Zack Spica, J Jon, M. A. Alatorre‐Ibargüengoitia, Loïc Peiffer, Robin Campion, C. Valdés, Gema Victoria Caballero-Jiménez, Kevin A. Vargas-Zamudio, Juan Manuel Espíndola

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriple junctionInduced seismicitySeismologyVolcanoGeologyTectonicsMagmaGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The triple junction between the North American, Caribbean and Cocos plates at the Guatemala–Mexico border is not well understood. It forms a broad region from around the active Tacaná volcano up to the Guatemala City graben. Tacaná is the westernmost active volcano of the Central American volcanic arc and is located at the intersection of four major active faults: the Polochic, Motagua, Jalpatagua and Tonalá faults. Using seismicity around the Tacaná volcano, we show that there is moderate to low tectonic seismic activity between the Guatemala City graben and the Tacaná volcano, possibly related to the ancient extremes of the Motagua and Jalpatagua faults. Therefore, we speculate that the triple junction would be located onshore, around the Tacaná volcano. We located earthquakes around the Tacaná volcano between January 2017 and October 2018, a period that includes the large Mw8.2 Tehuantepec (Chiapas) earthquake of 2017 September 8, located ∼190 km away. We identified four distinct types of seismicity, interpreted as having tectonic, hydrothermal, intermediate depth magmatic and deep magmatic origins. The tectonic seismicity occurred at depths between ∼5 and ∼30 km b.s.l., and may be associated with three faults around the Tacaná volcanic complex. These faults are oriented in NE–SW, aligned with the four Tacaná volcanic edifices; NW–SE, consistent with the Jalpatagua fault; and approximately EW, corresponding to the Motagua fault. The hydrothermal seismicity is observed at shallow depths, from the subsurface to about 2 km b.s.l., predominantly in the western sector of the Tacaná summit, and partially beneath the San Antonio volcano, an area known for intense hydrothermal activity. This seismicity is spatially related to the shallow portions of the same three faults described above. The intermediate depth magmatic seismicity is detected at depths between 5 and 12 km b.s.l. and is interpreted to be related to the presence of a shallow magma chamber beneath the Tacaná volcanic complex. Finally, the deep magmatic seismicity is located in the eastern part of the Tacaná, at depths ranging from 15 km to about 22 km b.s.l. This seismicity is interpreted to be due to a vertical dike intrusion that connects a deep magma reservoir located between 30 and 40 km depth, to the hypothesized shallower magma chamber associated with the intermediate depth seismicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.745

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207