MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410348882 · doi:10.1177/22925503251336249

Case Report: Palmaris Brevis Syndrome Resulting From Acute Wrist Hyperextension

2025· article· en· W4410348882 on OpenAlexaff
Austin E.G. McGrath

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentWristWrist painPresentation (obstetrics)SurgeryDifferential diagnosisReferral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 24-year-old, 19-week pregnant female presented to a community hospital emergency department following an acute hyperextension injury to the left wrist. The pertinent findings on the initial examination included pain, swelling of the ulnar aspect of her palm, and decreased, painful flexion of her small finger. The emergency room physician suspected a flexor tendon injury, and urgent referral to a tertiary level plastic surgery center was made. After plastic surgery evaluation, it was determined that her symptoms were related to the ulnar nerve opposed to an acute tendon injury. After ruling out common surgical pathologies, the diagnosis of palmaris brevis syndrome was provided. Palmaris brevis syndrome does not typically present acutely or post-trauma, and thus is not commonly observed by emergency physicians or acute care hand surgeons. This atypical presentation highlights that palmaris brevis syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of new onset ulnar-sided hand pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic SurgerySame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207