Myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosed by genetic testing for hereditary cancer: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic testing for solid tumor syndromes typically uses peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) as the source of germline DNA. This approach has shortcomings in certain situations, such as somatic mosaicism and hematologic malignancies. Here we describe a case where germline genetic testing on PBL revealed an unsuspected diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A 68-year-old male with a history of three solid tumors and a significant family history of cancer underwent germline genetic testing with a 76-gene hereditary cancer panel. Initial testing using PBL revealed deletions of the entire APC and CTNNA1 genes, suggestive of a contiguous deletion of chromosome 5 (del(5q)). Subsequent testing on cultured fibroblasts was negative, indicating the deletions were somatic. Bone marrow analysis confirmed the presence of del(5q) and a diagnosis of MDS. This case demonstrates the potential to uncover hematologic disorders through hereditary cancer genetic testing, emphasizing the importance of careful results interpretation, multidisciplinary follow-up, and DNA source selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".