MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410352968 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2025.112662

Growing the power system: Expansions on transmission and distribution systems for deep electrification

2025· review· en· W4410352968 on OpenAlexaff
Jessie Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrificationEngineering physicsDistribution (mathematics)Environmental scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsElectricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To reach net zero climate goals, existing fossil fuel-based energy consumption - such as heating and transportation - is proposed to be transferred to a clean power system. These plans for massive system expansion prompt us to reconsider traditional technical, economic, and regulatory frameworks and assumptions to ensure they still work in the context of deep electrification. This study examines the interaction between transmission and distribution systems during the accelerated expansion required for decarbonization. Transmission and distribution options, together with their connected sources, are modeled both together and separately to recognize optimal outcomes at a societal level. Essential future multidisciplinary research topics involving accelerated transmission and distribution expansions are identified. To ensure a responsible transition to net-zero, additional research is needed in: coordination between transmission and distribution expansions, a greatly expanded role of distribution, supply feasibility, demand elasticity and social implications, planning philosophy and methods, and future uncertainty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207