<b>Trajectoires artistiques, engagement et héritage du peintre Hamed Abdalla (1917-1985). </b>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract : Dans cet entretien, Samir Abdalla retrace les nombreuses trajectoires de la vie de son père, le peintre egyptien Hamed Abdalla, entre l'Égypte, l'Europe et le Monde arabe ainsi que de son œuvre qui, depuis les années 2000, fait l'objet d'un regain d'intérêt. Sur le fond, nous pouvons aussi retrouver les tensions politiques et les conflits qui ont marqué les relations entre le Monde arabe et l'Europe et qui ont sans doute influencé la réception et la reconnaissance des peintres issus du modernisme arabe dont Hamed Abdalla fait partie. Cet échange a été aussi l'occasion de faire ressortir l'héritage politique porté par Samir Abdalla. Ses documentaires témoignent en effet du même engagement de son père envers la question palestinienne. Abstract: In this interview, Samir Abdalla retraces the many trajectories in the life of his father, the Egyptian painter Hamed Abdalla, between Egypt, Europe and the Arab world, as well as his work, which has been the subject of renewed interest since the 2000s. In the background, we can also trace the political tensions and conflicts that have marked relations between the Arab world and Europe, and which have undoubtedly influenced the reception and recognition of the painters of Arab modernism, of which Hamed Abdalla is one. This exchange was also an opportunity to highlight Samir Abdalla's political heritage. His documentaries bear witness to his father's commitment to the Palestinian question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".