MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410358774 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2025.3570317

A Parameter-Centric Approach for Enhancing Misalignment Tolerance in Wireless Power Transfer Systems

2025· article· en· W4410358774 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaoyang Yuan, Qingxin Yang, Changsong Cai, Pengcheng Zhang, Ran Wang, Xianjie Ma, Maryam Saeedifard

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceState Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical EquipmentHebei University of TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsWireless power transferWirelessElectronic engineeringComputer scienceMaximum power transfer theoremPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a misalignment-tolerant design method for wireless power transfer (WPT) systems by optimization of compensation network parameters. Leveraging the derivation of two-port impedance parameters and adjoint sensitivity analysis, the coupling misalignment characteristics of the system are assessed. Subsequently, a parameter-centric misalignment tolerant approach, independent of the coil structure, is established through a linear fitting method. The proposed approach ensures zero-voltage switching (ZVS) and facilitates efficient stable constant current (CC) output. Experimental validation is performed on a scaled-down 500-W rated SS-compensated WPT prototype equipped with non-specialized square-shaped coils, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The proposed method enhances the SS-compensated system's ability to tolerate both horizontal and vertical misalignments, surpassing the performance of conventional SS topologies. Specifically, the system achieves over 85% efficiency within the misalignment tolerance range, with a peak efficiency of 93.2%. Additionally, the load current variation remains within 5.8% for 100 mm$x$-misalignment and$-$15 to$+$50 mm$z$-misalignment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207