A Parameter-Centric Approach for Enhancing Misalignment Tolerance in Wireless Power Transfer Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a misalignment-tolerant design method for wireless power transfer (WPT) systems by optimization of compensation network parameters. Leveraging the derivation of two-port impedance parameters and adjoint sensitivity analysis, the coupling misalignment characteristics of the system are assessed. Subsequently, a parameter-centric misalignment tolerant approach, independent of the coil structure, is established through a linear fitting method. The proposed approach ensures zero-voltage switching (ZVS) and facilitates efficient stable constant current (CC) output. Experimental validation is performed on a scaled-down 500-W rated SS-compensated WPT prototype equipped with non-specialized square-shaped coils, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The proposed method enhances the SS-compensated system's ability to tolerate both horizontal and vertical misalignments, surpassing the performance of conventional SS topologies. Specifically, the system achieves over 85% efficiency within the misalignment tolerance range, with a peak efficiency of 93.2%. Additionally, the load current variation remains within 5.8% for 100 mm$x$-misalignment and$-$15 to$+$50 mm$z$-misalignment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".