Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Steady Taylor-Couette flow of a particle-fluid suspension with non-neutrally buoyant particles between two coaxial rotating cylinders is studied with a novel two-fluid model. It is shown that steady particle distribution in particulate Taylor-Couette flow can exist in the case when the solid walls are permeable where the particles and the fluid can be sucked or injected with equal but opposite normal fluxes. With this assumption, an explicit formula is derived for the axisymmetric steady radial distribution of particles with particle migration in the dilute limit. Detailed results for several cases of major interest show that the local rate of particle migration depends largely on the local azimuthal speed, and the steady volume fraction of particles typically attains its maximum (or minimum) at the location of minimum (or maximum) local azimuthal speed. In particular, with a wider gap between two cylinders and a Stokes number of particles around the order of unity, the non-monotonic radial distribution of particle volume fraction with interior local maximum and/or minimum can occur when the inner cylinder rotates with the outer cylinder fixed or when the two cylinders counter-rotate with equal but opposite angular velocities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it