MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410361403 · doi:10.1515/9782760627284-003

Chapitre 2 La Passion du Canadien sur la Ligne Rouge :

2011· book-chapter· fr· W4410361403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olivier Bauer

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tous les fidèles de la Sainte-Flanelle, ceux qui écoutent religieusement le hockey du Canadien, espéraient une saison miraculeuse, mais elle se transforma en calvaire, en chemin de croix, en descente aux enfers.Les idoles jouèrent sans âme et ceux qui faisaient leur baptême dans la Ligue nationale de hockey eurent beau se démener corps et âme pour rester dans les bonnes grâces du grand Manitou, ils furent parfois sacrifiés quand on ne les obligea pas à partir sous d'autres cieux.La tâche de Jacques Martin était herculéenne.Jesus Price fut crucifié, frère André connut le purgatoire et même Plekanec fut cloué sur le banc.Heureusement, Halak fut un sauveur, Cammalleri finit par exorciser ses démons, par ressusciter pour prêcher par l'exemple et jouer comme un dieu.Mais il n'y eut pas de solution miracle -les points ne tombent jamais du ciel !-et le coup de grâce fut de perdre contre ces satanés Devils.Ce revers faillit sonner le glas des espoirs des Glorieux.Espérons que le repos soit salutaire, que l'an prochain, nous puissions louer les joueurs, qu'ils ramèneront enfin le Saint-* Ce chapitre est la traduction française d'un exposé intitulé « Habs' passion : on the thin red line between faith and idolatry », présenté lors du colloque « Hockey on the Border.An

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→