Minimally Invasive Tricuspid Valve Surgery: An Alternative Surgical Approach in the Era of Transcatheter Interventions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There has been significant growth in minimally invasive valve surgery over the past 2 decades, with novel approaches including video-assisted minithoracotomy, totally endoscopic, and robotic assisted. Outcomes of these techniques suggest that they can improve patient-reported outcomes, enhance mobility, reduce blood loss, and facilitate earlier discharge and return to work. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery now provides surgeons and patients with an alternative option for treating tricuspid valve disease. These operations can be conducted safely and yield favorable outcomes with carefully selected patients. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery, including a summary of the current literature on minithoracotomy valve repair or replacement, beating heart, redo, and multiple-valve surgery. Finally, we contextualize how minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery can play an important role in the era of emerging transcatheter strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it