MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410371701 · doi:10.47183/mes.2025-285

Assessment of biomarkers in biological fluids and neuroimaging changes in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma

2025· article· en· W4410371701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
А Н Боголепова, E V Makhnovich, Е. А. Коваленко, N A Osinovskaya, M. M. Beregov, O. V. Lyang

Bibliographic record

VenueExtreme Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroimagingGlaucomaDiseaseMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseBiological fluidsNeurosciencePathologyOphthalmologyPsychologyPsychiatryChemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) are gradually progressive neurodegenerative diseases leading to disability. According to literature data, POAG can be a predictor of AD development. Early diagnosis of these diseases contributes to a timely initiation of treatment and, as a result, a reduction in the disability of patients. Objective. To study biomarkers of early diagnosis in biological fluids and neuroimaging changes based on the results of MR morphometry in patients with AD and POAG and to conduct their comparative analysis. Materials and methods. In total, 90 patients with proven diagnosis of AD (group 1) and POAG (group 2) were examined. The study participants were divided into two groups according to their diagnosis: group 1 — 45 patients (9 (20%) men and 36 (80%) women) with AD; group 2 — 45 people (17 (37.8%) men and 28 (62.2%) women) with POAG. Neuropsychological testing included Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and a ten-words recall test. The beta-amyloid (Aβ) Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in the blood and sirtuin Sirt1, 3, 5, and 6 in saliva were assessed by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). In addition, MR morphometry of the brain was performed. Results. In group 1, cognitive impairments (CI) reaching the degree of dementia were detected; in group 2, pre-demential CI were observed ( p < 0.001). According to the neuropsychological examination, similar changes were noted in both groups, in particular, memory impairment of the hippocampal type. The results of the blood and saliva ELISA with the determination of biomarkers in the groups under comparison did not reveal statistically significant differences. At the same time, the parameters of both volumes and thicknesses according to MR morphometry were lower in group 1 ( p < 0.05), which may reflect neurodegenerative progression. In group 1, a direct correlation was found between a decrease in the saliva level of Sirt3 and a deterioration in direct reproduction (fifth reproduction) according to the ten-words recall test ( R = 0.43; p = 0.003). Correlations between changes in neuropsychological parameters and MR morphometry data, including a decrease in the volume of the entorhinal cortex, were noted in both groups. In groups 1 and 2, a decrease in the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in blood plasma was associated with a decrease in the thickness or volume of the entorhinal cortex, which is common for both groups with different CI severity. Taking into account the association with neuropsychological and blood parameters, including in patients with pre-demential CI from the POAG group, the determination of the volume and thickness of the entorhinal cortex can be regarded as a significant early marker of the neurodegenerative process. Conclusions. The established association between the volume and thickness of the entorhinal cortex with neuropsychological and blood parameters, including in patients with pre-demential CI from the POAG group, makes the determination of the volume and thickness of the entorhinal cortex a significant early marker of the neurodegenerative process. A comprehensive assessment of the results obtained by neuropsychological, laboratory, and neuroimaging diagnostic methods, as well as the search for diseases associated with the development of AD, such as POAG, are promising research areas, requiring larger cohort studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExtreme MedicineSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207