The Dynamic Effects of Economic Uncertainties and Geopolitical Risks on Saudi Stock Market Returns: Evidence from Local Projections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of various uncertainty channels on stock market returns in Saudi Arabia, with a focus on the Tadawul All Share Index (TASI). It examines factors such as Saudi-specific Geopolitical Risk, Global Oil Price Uncertainty, Climate Policy Uncertainty, and U.S. Monetary Policy Uncertainty. Using monthly data from November 1998 to June 2024 and the Local Projections (LP) methodology, the study examines how these uncertainties impact market returns across various time horizons, taking into account potential structural breaks and nonlinear dynamics. Our findings indicate significant variations in the market’s response to the uncertainty measures across two distinct periods. During the first period, geopolitical risks have a strong positive impact on market returns. Conversely, the second period reveals a reversal, with negative cumulative effects, suggesting a shift in risk–return dynamics. Oil Price Uncertainty consistently exhibits a negative impact in both periods, highlighting the changing nature of oil dependency in the Saudi market. Additionally, Climate Policy Uncertainty is becoming more significant, reflecting increased market sensitivity to global environmental policy changes. Our analysis reveals significant asymmetries in the effects of various uncertainty shocks, with Monetary Policy Uncertainty exhibiting nonlinear effects that peak at intermediate horizons, while commodity-related uncertainties exhibit more persistent impacts. These findings, which remain robust across various tests, offer critical insights for portfolio management, policy formulation, and risk assessment in emerging markets undergoing substantial economic changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".