FastConformation: A Standalone ML-Based Toolkit for Modeling and Analyzing Protein Conformational Ensembles at Scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning approaches like AlphaFold 2 (AF2) have revolutionized structural biology by accurately predicting the ground state structures of proteins. Recently, clustering and subsampling techniques that manipulate multiple sequence alignment (MSA) inputs into AlphaFold to generate conformational ensembles of proteins have also been proposed. Although many of these techniques have been made open source, they often require integrating multiple packages and can be challenging for researchers who have a limited programming background to employ. This is especially true when researchers are interested in subsampling to produce predictions of protein conformational ensembles, which require multiple computational steps. This manuscript introduces FastConformation, a Python-based application that integrates MSA generation, structure prediction via AF2, and interactive analysis of protein conformations and their distributions, all in one place. FastConformation is accessible through a user-friendly GUI suitable for non-programmers, allowing users to iteratively refine subsampling parameters based on their analyses to achieve diverse conformational ensembles. Starting from an amino acid sequence, users can make protein conformation predictions and analyze results in just a few hours on their local machines, which is significantly faster than traditional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Uniquely, by leveraging the subsampling of MSAs, our tool enables the generation of alternative protein conformations. We demonstrate the utility of FastConformation on proteins including the Abl1 kinase, LAT1 transporter, and CCR5 receptor, showcasing its ability to predict and analyze the protein conformational ensembles and effects of mutations on a variety of proteins. This tool enables a wide range of high-throughput applications in protein biochemistry, drug discovery, and protein engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".