MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410382922 · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf181

Neurological complications of <i>Orthopoxvirus</i> infections: neurotropism and neurovirulence

2025· article· en· W4410382922 on OpenAlexafffund
Hajar Miranzadeh Mahabadi, Ryan S. Noyce, David H. Evans, Christopher Power

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineOrthopoxvirusVirologyMonkeypoxBiologyVaccinia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the declaration of monkeypox virus (MPXV) infection as a global health emergency in 2022 by the World Health Organization and its ongoing presence, orthopoxviruses have garnered increasing attention, including their capacity to cause neurological disease. Indeed, the mpox syndrome caused by MPXV infection is recapitulated in humans for several other orthopoxviruses, including variola (VARV, the cause of smallpox), vaccinia (VACV), camelpox (CMPX) and cowpox (CPXV) viruses, albeit with variable disease severities. In addition to prototypic signs and symptoms of Orthopoxvirus infections, such as fever, swollen lymph nodes, malaise and skin lesions, MPXV-infected individuals also develop neurological syndromes such as headaches, myalgias, seizures, altered consciousness and encephalopathy/encephalitis. MRI of the brains of MPXV-infected persons can display hyperintensities consistent with brain oedema. Pleocytosis has also been reported in the CSF from persons with MPXV infections, implying active infection of the CNS. Of note, newborn rodents, or animals with severe combined immune deficiency, were found to be susceptible to MPXV infection with evidence that the virus can cross the blood-brain barrier. In the present review, we highlight the current understanding of Orthopoxvirus neuropathogenesis together with germane diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207