Tumor budding and poorly differentiated clusters as a biological continuum in colorectal cancer invasion and prognosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tumor budding (TB) and poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) are features of infiltrative growth patterns and powerful independent prognostic factors in colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the underlying biological mechanisms behind their role in CRC invasion is less understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular background and prognostic role of tumor cluster size at the invasive margin (IM) of CRC, and determine whether a biological continuum between TB and PDCs exists. Using a combination of spatial transcriptomic and immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques, we demonstrated a biological continuum from larger to smaller tumor clusters, with TB possessing greater invasive potential than PDCs. We deployed artificial intelligence on a cohort of 1134 Stage I-III CRC resections to automatically detect nearly 400,000 isolated tumor cells/clusters of any particular size across the IM. We determined that 2-celled clusters were the most abundant feature at the IM, and the simultaneous assessment of TB and PDCs yielded a prognostic performance stronger than either independently. Our study provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind CRC invasion while improving risk stratification for Stage I-III CRC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".