MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410385907 · doi:10.1111/coin.70060

Determining Treatment Dosage for Hypothyroidism Using Machine Learning

2025· article· en· W4410385907 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphSheridan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionMedicineMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Hypothyroidism is a prevalent chronic condition requiring precise levothyroxine dosing to prevent complications. However, factors such as stress and weight fluctuations complicate dosage determination. This study applies machine learning to improve dosage prediction accuracy. A synthetically generated dataset incorporating key clinical parameters (age, gender, TSH, T3, and T4) was used to train and evaluate predictive models. Compared to the current standard‐Poisson Regression (64.8% accuracy), our approach achieved significant improvements: Ridge and Lasso Regression (82%), Support Vector Regression (83%), and k‐Nearest Neighbors (86%). These results highlight the potential of machine learning in optimizing hypothyroidism treatment and enhancing patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it