Growable and interpretable neural control with online continual learning for autonomous lifelong locomotion learning machines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continual locomotion learning faces four challenges: incomprehensibility, sample inefficiency, lack of knowledge exploitation, and catastrophic forgetting. Thus, this work introduces growable online locomotion learning under multicondition (GOLLUM), which exploits the interpretability feature to address the aforementioned challenges. GOLLUM has two dimensions of interpretability: layer-wise interpretability for neural control function encoding and column-wise interpretability for robot skill encoding. With this interpretable control structure, GOLLUM utilizes neurogenesis to unsupervisely increment columns (ring-like networks); each column is trained separately to encode and maintain a specific primary robot skill. GOLLUM also transfers the parameters to new skills and supplements the learned combination of acquired skills through another neural mapping layer added (layer-wise) with online supplementary learning. On a physical hexapod robot, GOLLUM successfully acquired multiple locomotion skills (e.g., walking, slope climbing, and bouncing) autonomously and continuously within an hour using a simple reward function. Furthermore, it demonstrated the capability of combining previous learned skills to facilitate the learning process of new skills while preventing catastrophic forgetting. Compared to state-of-the-art locomotion learning approaches, GOLLUM is the only approach that addresses the four challenges above mentioned without human intervention. It also emphasizes the potential exploitation of interpretability to achieve autonomous lifelong learning machines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".