MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410394491 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3568367

Deep Unfolding Learning Aided ISAC Transceiver Design

2025· article· en· W4410394491 on OpenAlexaff
Jifa Zhang, Yongxu Zhu, Nan Zhao, Shi Jin, Xianbin Wang, Derrick Wing Kwan Ng, Naofal Al‐Dhahir

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceTransceiverComputer architectureTelecommunicationsComputer networkWirelessArtificial intelligenceMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) can enhance spectral efficiency and facilitate the diverse emerging applications via sharing the same spectrum and hardware between communication and sensing. However, effective operation of ISAC may suffer from high complexity. In this paper, we develop a low-complexity deep unfolding learning-aided transceiver design scheme for ISAC in a cluttered environment. In particular, we optimize the transmit waveform and receive filtering to minimize the weighted sum of multi-user interference power and the reciprocal of sensing signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), while adhering to the constraints of a constant modulus signal and waveform similarity. An alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based iterative algorithm is first developed to address this non-convex optimization problem with both equality and inequality constraints. To further reduce the computational complexity, we develop two deep unfolding neural networks (NNs), termed ADMM-DL-NET and ADMM-PGD-NET, to handle this problem, which can unfold the underlying ADMM-based iterative algorithm to a lightweight neural network with learnable parameters and eliminate the need for the bisection method by adopting the Uzawa’s method and projected gradient descent, respectively. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed deep unfolding NNs can achieve comparable performance to the ADMM-based iterative algorithm with significantly reduced complexity, and outperform the unsupervised learning benchmarks in performance and number of learnable parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207