MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410395790 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.14.654107

Coherent thalamic inputs organize head direction signal in the medial entorhinal cortex

2025· preprint· en· W4410395790 on OpenAlexafffund
Gilberto R Vite, Adrien Peyrache

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAzrieli FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsEntorhinal cortexHead (geology)NeuroscienceSIGNAL (programming language)Cortex (anatomy)Computer sciencePsychologyGeologyHippocampusPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Successful navigation relies on signals that remain stable despite environmental changes. This stability can arise by constraining neuronal activity to low-dimensional subspaces. During sleep, when external input is reduced, pairwise coordination persists in the spatial navigation system, as observed for head-direction (HD) cells of the anterodorsal nucleus (ADn) and grid cells of the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC). As ADn is crucial for spatial representation in the MEC, we hypothesized that coherent HD input underlies MEC organization. To test this, we performed simultaneous recordings in the ADn and MEC during wakefulness and sleep. We found that HD cell pairs maintained stable coordination across both states, and that MEC cell coordination was partly driven by common inputs from ADn HD cells. These results suggest that MEC activity is shaped, in part, by coherent thalamic HD signals, supporting stable network organization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→