MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410397042 · doi:10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100843

Differential Treatment Effects by Smoking Status for NSCLC Therapies (2010–2023): A Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4410397042 on OpenAlexaff
Fernanda Malucelli Favorito, Fábio Ynoe de Moraes, Consolacion Molto Valiente, Michelle B. Nadler, Alexandra Desnoyers, Eitan Amir, Brooke E. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueJTO Clinical and Research Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHôpital Charles-Le MoyneLakeridge HealthCancer Care South EastQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisLung cancerOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: NSCLC, largely linked to smoking, remains a global health challenge with poor prognosis despite therapeutic advances. Understanding how smoking status affects treatment response is essential for optimizing therapies, yet comprehensive analyses are lacking. Methods: less than 0.05 for significance. Results: = 0.05). Conclusion: Our analysis supports smokers' improved OS from immunotherapy in NSCLC, contrasting with nonsmokers' improved PFS with small molecule therapies, possibly due to differences in tumor mutations and immune microenvironment induced by smoking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.537
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTO Clinical and Research ReportsSame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207